What "church" looked like in the early Church: First century

    In the last post, we started to examine what church gatherings looked like in the early Church by studying the Lord’s supper and ritual meals in the Greco-Roman world. Now that we have this background information, we can look at the details of the first-century Christian gathering. The main first-century texts that I will use here are the accounts of Jesus’ last supper (Matt 26:17-30; Mark 14:12-26; Luke 22:7-38); Acts 2:42-47; Acts 20:7-11; 1 Corinthians 10–14; and Didache 9–10, 14.

Where?

    First of all, where did the earliest Christians come together? Our earliest sources unanimously tell us that they met in houses. The book of Acts says that breaking bread, corporate prayer, and teaching all took place kat’ oikon (“by house”: 2:46; 12:12; 20:20). St Paul’s letters refer to “the church in their/her/your house” (Rom 16:5; 1 Cor 16:19; Col 4:15; Phlm 1:2), and St John instructs a certain local church not to receive those who deny Christ’s manifestation in the flesh “into your house” (2 John 1:10).

    What would the meeting area have looked like? The gathering took place in the dining room, which in most houses would have been upstairs (Mark 14:15; Luke 22:12; Acts 1:13; 20:8, 11). It likely was arranged according to the standard pattern, with three tables arranged in a U-shape seating about a dozen people at most, which testifies to the small number of Christians at this time. As the local church grew, the participants would spill out into other rooms of the house, eventually requiring a change in location altogether. Insofar as gatherings continued into the night (see below), the room was lit by oil lamps (cf. Acts 20:8).

    The posture of those at the gathering is indicated by Paul as “sitting” (1 Cor 14:30) rather than reclining, although this might have been a necessity to fit a larger number of people around the tables. [9] The ideal in the gospel accounts is still reclining at the table (Matt 8:11; 26:7, 20; Mark 2:15; 14:3, 18; Luke 13:29; 14:7-11; 24:30; John 13:12; 21:20). The same passage indicates that those prophesying at the table would stand, since Paul distinguishes “someone sitting” from the prophets who are speaking (1 Cor 14:29-30). The ideal posture for praying was also standing, with hands outstretched (Matt 6:5; Mark 11:25; 1 Tim 2:8; cf. Ps 63:4; 134:2; 141:2; Philo, Vit Cont 66, 80, 83). [10] The Christian practice of praying toward the East can be traced back at least to the mid-2nd century, with some scholars arguing for a first century origin. [11] Philo reports that the Jewish Therapeutae sect also prayed toward the East during their communal meals (Vit Cont 89).

    How were the meeting rooms decorated, if at all? We know that as soon as Christians obtained their own designated spaces for prayer in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, they were decorated with religious imagery, as shown by the Roman catacombs and Dura Europos church. [12] The gnostic Acts of John show that the creation and veneration of portrait icons of saints was already known among Christians in the 2nd century. [13] Eusebius of Caesarea, in the early 4th century, claims in the first century paintings of the apostles Peter and Paul and even Christ himself were made (Church History VII.18.4). But there is no contemporary evidence for Christian art in the first century, and it seems unlikely that first-century believers would have entirely painted or redecorated their dining rooms with no obvious rationale. At most, there was likely a cross inscribed on the wall of some house churches, as seen in a pre-AD 79 houses at Pompeii. [14]

When?

    Now that we’ve seen where the early Christians gathered, and how this space was used for worship, let’s investigate when they gathered. Acts 2:46 tells us that the very first Christians in Jerusalem were breaking bread together “every day.” However, from very early on, “the first day of the week” (i.e., Sunday) was marked out for gathering and breaking bread (Acts 20:7; 1 Cor 16:2). St John states that the first appearance of the risen Jesus to the assembled disciples was at “evening on that day, the first day of the week,” and his subsequent appearance “a week later [when] his disciples were again in the house” (John 20:19, 26). The Didache, a first-century church order, says that believers gather “on the Lord’s own day” (kata kyriakēn... kyriou) to break bread and give thanks (eucharistēsate).

    The gathering took place in the evening, according to our earliest sources, as expected for a supper. This is implied in Acts 20:7-11, where the believers in Troas meet to break bread “on the first day,” and Paul holds discourse with them at length “until midnight,” after which they actually broke bread and continued to converse “until dawn.” Jesus’ last supper began in the evening (Matt 26:20; Mark 14:17), he broke bread on the evening after his resurrection (Luke 24:29-30), and his first appearance to the assembled disciples was “evening on... the first day of the week” (John 20:19), according to the gospel accounts. The evening of the first day may have been Saturday evening (since Jewish practice reckoned days from evening to evening) or Sunday evening, with more recent scholarship arguing for Sunday evening. [15]

    In the early second century, the hostile witness of Pliny the Younger (who persecuted Christians) shows the beginning stage of the Sunday morning gathering. Pliny writes to the emperor Trajan, reporting the testimony of apostate believers about Christian practices:

They maintained, however, that all that their guilt or error involved was that they were accustomed to assemble at dawn on a fixed day, to sing a hymn antiphonally to Christ as God, and to bind themselves by an oath, not for the commission of some crime, but to avoid acts of theft, brigandage, and adultery, not to break their word, and not to withhold money deposited with them when asked for it. When these rites were completed, it was their custom to depart, and then to assemble again to take food, which was however common and harmless. (Letters 10.96.7)

This report is clearly skewed by the apostates’ attempt to appear harmless to Pliny – for example, their insistence that their “oath” is about civil obedience and that the eucharistic meal is “common and harmless.” However, we can see that in early 2nd century Asia Minor, Christians were accustomed to meet twice on Sundays, first in the morning for prayer and hymnody, then again in the evening for the communal meal. Over time (in the 2nd and 3rd centuries), the meal would also gradually migrate to Sunday morning.

Who?

    Keeping in mind when and where the first-century Christian gathering took place, who was present and involved? In the typical Greco-Roman banquet, women were not invited and slaves waited on the men who dined. In the Christian gathering, on the other hand, women were included as full participants who could pray and prophesy alongside the men (1 Cor 11:4-5). Likewise, gentiles were included as full participants alongside Jews, even though de facto there was some segregation, which St Paul condemned (Gal 2:11-14). The table was not served by slaves, but by voluntary attendants (diakonoi, deacons: Acts 6:1-6; cf. Philo, Vit Cont 68, 70-72). This was central to the self-understanding of the earliest believers as a community: “There is neither Jew nor gentile, slave nor free, male and female, for indeed you all are one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:28).

    However, the inclusivity of the early Christian banquet wasn’t unlimited. The Didache insists that only those “baptized into the name of the Lord” can “eat or drink of this Eucharist,” citing Jesus’ statement, “Do not give the holy things to the dogs” (9.5). The Didache later refers to the necessity of confessing sins before breaking bread, “that your sacrifice may be pure,” and says that no one with an unreconciled disagreement should join, “that your sacrifice may not be defiled” (14.1-3).

    St Paul likewise writes to the believers at Corinth that they should examine themselves before partaking, since “all who eat and drink without discerning the body eat and drink judgment against themselves” (1 Cor 11:27-32). He said this in reference to their tendency to divide themselves at the gathering, eating their own food which they brought rather than sharing communally (11:18-22). This was a local manifestation of the earliest believers’ tendency to fall back into discriminating according to social status at their banquets, which was condemned (Luke 14:7-11; 22:24-27; James 2:1-6). At the first-century Christian gathering, therefore, only baptized believers were invited. But all baptized believers could participate equally, except those in public, harmful, and unrepentant sin (cf. 1 Cor 5:1-2), including those who discriminated against others at the meal.

    What about those who served at the meal? The New Testament texts distinguish two offices (Acts 6:1-6; 20:17-35; Phil 1:1; 1 Tim 3:1-13; 5:17-20; Titus 1:5-9; 1 Pet 5:1-2): the overseer (episkopos, bishop) or elder (presbyteros, priest) and the attendant (diakonos, deacon). Other first-century texts refer to the same two offices (Didache 15; 1 Clem 42.4-5; 44.1-5). [16] The deacons would attend the table (Acts 6:1-6), while the bishops/priests would “offer the gifts,” i.e., the bread and cup, themselves (1 Clem 44.3). In the first century, these functions could also be carried out by itinerant apostles, teachers, and prophets (Didache 15.2). [17]

What?

    Then what exactly took place at these first-century Christian gatherings? The main event, so to speak, was the meal itself, the bread and the cup. St Paul writes that when the Corinthian believers “come together,” it is “to eat the Lord’s banquet” (1 Cor 11:17-18, 20, 33-34; cf. Didache 14). Before eating, a blessing (eulogia) or thanksgiving (eucharistia) was pronounced over both the bread and the cup. Fixed prayers of thanksgiving over the cup and the bread, separately, are provided in the first-century Didache, along with a prayer of thanksgiving for after the meal, although these were not always precisely followed: “prophets” could extemporize their own prayers (Didache 9-10). The assembled believers would respond to each thanksgiving with “Amen” (1 Cor 14:16).

    Most first-century texts describe the blessing of the cup followed by the bread (Luke 22:17-19; 1 Cor 10:16; Didache 9-10; Papias in Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.33.3-4). However, the accounts of Jesus’ last supper describe the blessing of the bread followed by the cup (Matt 26:26-29; Mark 14:22-25; Luke 22:19-20; 1 Cor 11:23-25). [18] This implies that there was no universally accepted, fixed order of prayers of thanksgiving in the first-century church.

    Paul lists a few other activities that might take place at the Christian gathering: “a hymn, a teaching, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation” (1 Cor 14:26). Elsewhere he advises believers not to get drunk (presumably during the symposion), but rather “to sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs among yourselves” (Eph 5:18-19; cf. Col 3:16). Acts 2:42 refers to “the apostles’ teaching and fellowship” and “the prayers” alongside breaking bread. The letters of apostles and other authoritative writings would be publicly read at these gatherings (Acts 15:22-30; Col 4:16; 1 Thess 5:27; 1 Tim 4:13; Phlm 1:1-2; Rev 1:3). The apostles exhorted believers to greet one another with a “holy kiss” or “kiss of love” (Rom 16:16; 1 Cor 16:20; 2 Cor 13:12; 1 Thess 5:26; 1 Pet 5:14). The Didache (14.1) also prescribes confession of sins before breaking bread together.

    Was there an order to these activities? The Didache (9–10; 14) presents a basic structure for the deipnon of the meal: confession of sins → blessing of the cup and bread → eating → prayer(s) of thanksgiving. St Paul addresses issues at Corinth throughout the whole meal, and the structure of his critique implies that the meal was (like the typical Greco-Roman supper) a deipnon followed by a symposion involving various spiritual activities (1 Cor 10–14). They had no fixed order for the varied activities during their symposion, which led to some practical issues that Paul confronts (14:26-33). Acts 2:42 suggests an order for the earliest Jerusalem churches: teaching and fellowship → breaking bread → prayers, while Acts 20:7-11 gives a description of a particular communal meal which involved (at least) discourse → breaking bread → further discourse.

Why?

    Finally, why did Christians in the first century gather together for a communal meal? The clearest statement about this, once again, comes from St Paul’s letter to the Corinth church:

The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a sharing in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a sharing in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread. Consider the people of Israel: Are not those who eat the sacrifices partners in the altar?

What do I imply, then? That food sacrificed to idols is anything or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what they sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be partners with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. Or are we provoking the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than he? (1 Cor 10:16-22)

The communal meal for first-century Christians is a sharing, or communion (koinōnia), in the body and blood of Christ which constitutes the believers as themselves the one body of Christ. This is the uniquely Christian form of sacrifice, analogous to Israelite and pagan sacrifices – for what is Christ’s body if not the sacrifice par excellence?

    The earliest fixed eucharistic prayers (Didache 9–10) don’t include what later came to be known as the words of institution (“This is my body... This is my blood”). However, their inclusion in all of the New Testament accounts of the Lord’s banquet shows that this was very much in the background of the earliest Christians’ celebration of the communal meal (Matt 26:26-28; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:19-20; 1 Cor 11:23-25). [19] The prayer over the bread asks God to gather his Church to become one just as the bread has become one (Didache 9.4; cf. 1 Cor 10:17), and the author refers to the meal as “sacrifice” (14.1-3; citing Mal 1:11). Clement of Rome also references bishops in the first century serving “the offerings” (ta dōra; 1 Clem 44:4).

    The activities during the symposion of the meal also had a function. Paul expands on his statement about believers becoming “one body.” They are “the body of Christ” and, like any human body, there are many members with different functions, in order to collectively build each other up in love (1 Cor 12–14; esp. 12:12-27). If the purpose of the banquet is to constitute all the believers in one communion of the body of Christ, then the symposium with its various activities – prayer, hymnody, teaching, prophecy – strengthens this reality and makes it visible. Thus, the Lord’s supper visibly manifests Christ himself within the world in and as the communion of the faithful.

Reconstruction

    Now that we’ve examined these first-century sources for details about the earliest Christian Eucharist, we can try to reconstruct what an ideal gathering of believers would have looked like at that time. Keep in mind that this is necessarily speculative, since we can’t be sure it looked the same everywhere and these texts come from different contexts.

  • On the evening of the first day of the week, you head to the house of the overseer (one of them, at least) of your local church. Only those who have been baptized into the Way are invited, but everyone baptized is invited, regardless of social status.
  • When you arrive, you go upstairs to the lamp-lit dining room. You take notice of the cross carved into the wall and remember what Jesus, the Messiah, endured for your sake.
  • You greet the other believers there with a kiss. If there’s anything left unresolved between you and others, you make sure to confess and reconcile with them. You know that this is a serious matter, and there can be no divisions as you will all be united by this meal. Some have been prevented from joining before, because they were unrepentant about their harm toward others.
  • You take your seat at the table as the deacons bring out the food and drink, which was brought by other members of the community. The overseer takes his cup and prays: “We give you thanks, our Father, for the holy vine of your child David, which you made known to us through your Son Jesus. Yours is the glory unto ages of ages.” With the rest of the believers, you say “Amen.”
  • The overseer takes bread and breaks it. “We give you thanks, our Father, for the life and knowledge which you made known to us through your Son Jesus. Yours is the glory unto ages of ages. As this broken bread was scattered upon the mountains, so may your Church be gathered together from the ends of the earth into your kingdom. For yours is the glory and the power through Jesus Christ unto ages of ages.” “Amen.”
  • Now that the food and drink has been blessed, the deacons share the food between everyone there. You all eat joyously, knowing that in this meal you are sharing in Christ’s own body and blood, and partaking in his sacrifice. You are all being united into one body of Christ.
  • After the meal, the overseer prays again:
    • “We give you thanks, holy Father, for your holy name, which you have made to dwell in our hearts, and for the knowledge and faith and immortality, which you have made known unto us through your Son Jesus. Yours is the glory unto ages of ages.
    • “You, Almighty Master, created all things for your name’s sake, and gave food and drink to men for their enjoyment, that they might give you thanks. And you have given us spiritual food and drink and eternal life through your Son. Most of all, we give you thanks that you are powerful. Yours is the glory unto ages of ages.
    • “Remember, Lord, your Church, and deliver it from all evil and perfect it in your love. Gather it – the sanctified one – together from the four winds into your kingdom which you have prepared for it. For yours is the power and the glory unto ages of ages.
    • “May grace come and may this world pass away. Hosanna to the God of David. If any man is holy, let him come; if any man is not, let him repent. O Lord, come!”
  • You, and the rest of the body, agree: “Amen.” A prophet who is passing through your city stands and offers his own prayer, along with some others in the body.
  • A letter that you all previously received from the apostle Paul is read aloud. Someone who is known as a teacher in your community offers an exhortation based on this letter. Another also offers a word of advice. You stand and lead the gathered body in a hymn that you all know, and the overseer and a few others do the same after you.
  • You and the believing members of your household return home well after dark. There is a renewed understanding that you all are part of something truly holy, that you are united to Christ himself, and you and your household will do your best to manifest this reality as shining lights in a dark world.
______________________________

[9] Smith, From Symposium to Eucharist, 178.

[10] This is borne out by second- and third-century Christian art in the Roman catacombs, which depicts this posture also at the eucharistic table (Catacomb of St Callixtus, Room A2).

[11] Uwe Michael Lang, Turning Towards the Lord: Orientation in Liturgical Prayer (Ignatius Press, 2009), 35-61.

[12] Robin M. Jensen and Mark D. Ellison, The Routledge Handbook of Early Christian Art (Routledge, 2018), see especially chaps. 2, 12, and 17 on the catacombs, panel portraits, and Dura-Europos baptistry.

[13] Acts of John 26-29 describes how the disciple Lycomedes, who had been resurrected by God through John, commisioned a portrait of John, took it to his bedroom, crowned it with garlands, and lit lamps before it. John, the mouthpiece of the gnostic author, confronts him for “still living in heathen fashion.” Lycomedes answers that he has only one God, but “next to that God, it is right that the men who have benefitted us should be called gods.” John retorts that the portrait captures only his “fleshly image,” being “a dead likeness of the dead,” and Lycomedes should instead paint with the virtues. This episode implies that debate over venerating panel-portrait icons was already underway between Christians and gnostics in the 2nd century (cf. Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 4.13).

[14] Bruce W. Longenecker, The Cross before Constantine: The Early Life of a Christian Symbol (Fortress Press, 2015), 121-148; The Crosses of Pompeii: Jesus-Devotion in a Vesuvian Town (Fortress Press, 2016); but for a contrasting perspective, see John Granger Cook, “Alleged Christian Crosses in Herculaneum and Pompeii,” Vigiliae Christianae 72, no. 1 (2018): 1-20.

[15] Aliykin, The Earliest History of the Christian Gathering, 40-49.

[16] The terms episkopos and presbyteros are clearly used interchangeably in first-century texts. However, this doesn’t mean that monepiscopacy is a later development, if by this we refer to the fact that only one person actually offers the Eucharist, which is the original and most important meaning of “one bishop” found in St Ignatius’ writings (Smyrn 9). The designation of one person as the host, or symposiarch, or president, was a common feature of banquets in the Greco-Roman world. In light of this, we can’t really speak about the post-apostolic development of the episcopate as an office, but rather the development of the presbytery as a separate office between bishop and deacon. Even the reference to multiple “bishops” in one city (Phil 1:1) is unsurprising, given the fact that the dining rooms in which first-century Christians held their gatherings likely couldn’t accommodate all the believers in some cities, whereas other cities did have only one gathering (e.g., Rom 16:23).

[17] Aliykin, Earliest History, 69-73.

[18] St Luke’s account describes the blessing of the cup followed by the bread, then another cup after the banquet. This reworking suggests that he was trying to reconcile the existing accounts of the last supper (bread-then-cup) with his own community’s practice (cup-then-bread before meal): Aliykin, Earliest History, 233-234.

[19] St John’s gospel doesn’t include these words in his account, which lacks any description of the supper itself, giving a lengthy account of the symposium discourse instead. However, the pericope about chewing Jesus’ flesh and drinking his blood (John 6:51-58) would hardly have been understood as referring to anything other than the Eucharist: Aliykin, Earliest History, 130-132.

What "church" looked like in the early Church: Some background

    How did the earliest Christians experience “church”? This is something I’ve recently been interested in studying. After all, while the intellectual history and development of doctrine in the early Church is certainly important and interesting, that would have been above the pay grade of the average believer. For most Christians – as well as for the theologians and bishops who formulated doctrine – their faith was primarily encountered in the gathering as a community of faith to offer prayers and commune together. In this series of posts, I’ll do my best to reconstruct what this gathering would have looked like in the first through fourth centuries. [1]

    As a disclaimer: even if we can know what “church” looked like in the first century, that doesn’t mean it’s an ideal to which we should return today. Just because something is more ancient does not mean that it’s more valid. Some aspects of early Church practice were accidental, prompted by the historical circumstances of the period, while others are indeed essential to the Church; it’s not possible to tell them apart without looking from the vantage point of a certain tradition. I strongly suspect that believers from every Christian tradition today would find both familiarity and foreignness if they walked into a first-century church gathering.

The Lord’s Banquet

    St. Paul is our earliest witness to what Christian gatherings looked like. In his first letter to the church at Corinth, he writes that when they “come together as a church” it’s supposed to be to eat something called “the Lord’s banquet” (kyriakon deipnon; 1 Cor 11:18-20). From this very early stage, believers in Jesus connected their gatherings to a particular historical event in the life of Jesus of Nazareth: the banquet that he held “on the night he was betrayed” (1 Cor 11:23). Paul claims to have received this tradition from the Lord himself and handed it on to the Corinthians.

    Each of the gospel accounts records Jesus’ last supper with his disciples. However, St. Luke is the only one to explicitly connect it with an ongoing practice. Here is his account:

Then came the day of Unleavened Bread, on which the Passover lamb had to be sacrificed. So Jesus sent Peter and John, saying, “Go and prepare the Passover meal for us that we may eat it.” They asked him, “Where do you want us to make preparations for it?” “Listen,” he said to them, “when you have entered the city, a man carrying a jar of water will meet you; follow him into the house he enters and say to the owner of the house, ‘The teacher asks you, “Where is the guest room, where I may eat the Passover with my disciples?”’ He will show you a large room upstairs, already furnished. Make preparations for us there.” So they went and found everything as he had told them, and they prepared the Passover meal.

When the hour came, he took his place at the table, and the apostles with him. He said to them, “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer, for I tell you, I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.” Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he said, “Take this and divide it among yourselves, for I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” Then he took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” And he did the same with the cup after supper, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.” (Luke 22:7-20)

    The fact that St. Luke (unlike St. Mark or St. Matthew) presents Jesus as saying, “Do this in remembrance of me,” implies that he is consciously modeling his account of the supper after the practices of his own community. Of course, this doesn’t mean that the other gospel writers didn’t have the same practice; Paul’s comments imply that this was universal among apostolic-era Christians. Therefore, the other accounts are also useful for our purposes. There are only a handful of differences between the synoptic gospels.

  • Matthew only says that Jesus and the disciples will have the Passover meal at the (unnamed) man’s house, while Mark and Luke specify that they will be in the upstairs room for guests.
  • Mark and Matthew place the discourse about the one who will betray Jesus before the blessing of the bread and the cup, whereas Luke places it after the blessing.
  • Mark and Matthew describe the blessing of the bread followed by the cup, whereas Luke describes the blessing of a cup followed by the bread, then another cup “after the banquet.”
  • Mark and Matthew both state that they sang “the hymn” after eating, which Luke does not record.
St. John, on the other hand, records very little about the banquet itself (other than that it took place), instead he puts the emphasis on the discourse which he presents as following the supper (chaps. 13–17).

    I don’t think that we can know whether these differences actually reflect differences in the practice of the gospel writers’ communities. However, as I’ll show below, there was a diversity of custom in the earliest church gatherings which seems to at least partially correspond to the differences between gospel accounts. There is a broad similarity between the synoptic accounts of the last supper: (1) it took place within a house (2) on the evening of Passover, (3) involving a blessing of the bread and cup (4) in which Jesus declared them to be “my body” and “my blood,” (5) with a discourse either preceding or following the blessing and (6) a hymn at the end (albeit not reported by Luke).

The Greco-Roman Supper

    Let’s be clear: it would be completely wrong to look for “the Eucharist” in the first century, if we mean the ritual eating of a small piece of bread and sip of wine. Every single source from this period describes a full meal taking place when gathered together, which was in no way distinguished from the sacrament itself. St. Jude refers to this meal as the “love feast” (Jude 1:12), which was still used as a synonym for the Eucharist by St. Ignatius of Antioch in the early second century (Smyrn 8.2). When Luke-Acts refers to “breaking bread,” it likely indicates the same corporate meal (Luke 24:30; Acts 2:42, 46; 20:7, 11).

    However, it would be just as much of a mistake to think that there was no ritual involved at all in the earliest church gatherings. In fact, banquets in the ancient Jewish and wider Greco-Roman world were very ritualized affairs. The ideal evening meal in classical Greece comprised two parts: a banquet (deipnon) followed by drinking and discourse (symposion). [2] The second stage was initiated by various rituals including a libation, pouring out a small amount of wine accompanied by prayer to a deity. [3] The host would arrange the guests, who reclined around a U-shaped table, according to their social rank; women and slaves were not invited. Although actual suppers often deviated from this structure, it was considered the ideal for several centuries. [4]

    Jewish suppers were also ritualized in the ancient world, at least partially due to Hellenistic influence. In the early 2nd century BC, the book of Sirach (31:12-32:13) provides banquet etiquette along the lines of the classical Greek practice, including the invitations, the singular host/president, ranking guests according to social status, music, and the deipnon followed by symposion, although he warns against excessive luxury. [5]

    The Greco-Roman supper also influenced later rabbinic practice, although with clear differences: the ideal meal consisted of three courses, each including a mixed cup of wine and water, with the ritual washing of hands (by servants) and benediction between each course; the prayer might be said by the host or by all of the participants, depending on the circumstance. [6] The rabbinic Passover liturgy, which crystallized in the late 3rd century AD, involves a first course (the deipnon) with the mixed cup, benediction, and meal, then a second course (the symposion) with another mixed cup, designated readings from Deuteronomy, Exodus, and the Psalms, followed by prayers of praise (and a third and fourth mixed cup). [7]

    The evidence for Jewish meal practices in the first century is somewhat scantier. We know that the Pharisee sect advocated ritual hand washing before meals, which Christians apparently rejected (Matt 15:1-20; Mark 7:1-23). Our best evidence comes from the Essene sect at Qumran, which left us the Dead Sea Scrolls. Josephus reports that twice per day the members of the community would wash themselves ritually and put on linen garments, then come together to the dining room of an apartment and eat together. Both before and after the meal, the priest would recite a blessing, and the participants would praise God together (Wars II.129-133). The Community Rule at Qumran provides a similar description:

Wherever there are ten men of the Council of the Community there shall not lack a Priest among them. And they shall all sit before him according to their rank and shall be asked their counsel in all things in that order. And when the table has been prepared for eating, and the new wine for drinking, the Priest shall be the first to stretch out his hand to bless the first-fruits of the bread and new wine.

And where the ten are, there shall never lack a man among them who shall study the Law continually, day and night concerning the right conduct of a man with his companion. And Congratulation shall watch in community for a third of every night of the year, to read the book and to study Law and to pray together. (1QS 6.3-8)

This seems to correspond to the deipnon-symposion structure (meal followed by discourse), with seating “according to their rank” (cf. 6.8-9) and a blessing pronounced by a priest. It looks like there was also a discourse preceding the meal, however (they “shall be asked their counsel in all things in that order”), to which Josephus also alludes (Wars II.132). The rules governing this discourse are given in 1QS 6.9-13. The communal meal of the Essenes could only be participated after one year of being a member, and the communal drink after two years (6.16-23); certain infractions were punished by exclusion from the meal, from ten days to lifelong (6.24-7.24; cf. Wars II.143-145).

    Philo of Alexandria (mid-1st century) describes the communal meals of the Therapeutae, another Jewish sect, contrasting them with both the Essenes and Greek banquets (Vit Cont 30-37, 64-89). According to his account, members of this sect would assemble once per week, especially every seven weeks, for their communal feast. They would begin by standing and praying with hands outstretched. Then both men and women would recline (on the right and left, respectively) on wooden boards and be served, not by slaves (because they had none), but by voluntary attendants. The “president” of the gathering would offer remarks, interpreting the Scriptures allegorically and/or answering a question posed by another. Then the members, beginning with the president, would sing hymns (all together chanting the refrains). After this, the attendants would bring in the meal itself, which was “all-holy” (panagestaton) leavened bread and pure water. Finally, the members would rise and form two choirs (male and female) to sing antiphonal (i.e., two-part) hymns throughout the night.

    The basic structure of this feast, prayer → discourse → hymnody → bread and cup → hymnody, should be familiar to most Christians. This is the basic shape of the liturgy that is found in every Christian rite, both Eastern and Western. In fact, Christians in the fourth century and later found such familiarity here that they equated the Therapeutae with the earliest Christian ascetics (Eusebius, Church History II.17; Epiphanius, Panarion 29.5; Ps.-Dionysius, Church Hierarchy 6.1.3). If this is correct, then Philo is an incredibly valuable witness to the basic shape of the Christian liturgy before AD 50! However, there are chronological difficulties with equating the Therapeutae and early Christians. [8] Even so, this shows what a ritual meal looked like in another first-century Jewish sect.

    Originally I had intended to reconstruct the details of a first-century church gathering in this post, but it started to get way too long! I will continue this study in my next post, and we'll look at when and where this gathering took place, who was there, what would have happened there, and why the earliest Christians felt it was important to gather for a meal in this way.

______________________________

[1] In studying this topic, there were a few books that I found very helpful (among other sources): Marcel Metzger, History of the Liturgy: The Major Stages (Liturgical Press, 1997); Paul F. Bradshaw, The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship: Sources and Methods for the Study of Early Liturgy, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 2002); Dennis E. Smith, From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early Christian World (Augsburg Fortress, 2003); Valeriy A. Aliykin, The Earliest History of the Christian Gathering: Origin, Development and Content of the Christian Gathering in the First to Third Centuries (Brill, 2010); Paul F. Bradshaw and Maxwell E. Johnson, The Eucharistic Liturgies: Their Evolution and Interpretation (Liturgical Press, 2012).

I was inspired to try my hand at reconstructing an early Christian gathering, from an Orthodox perspective, by these reconstructions from Christians of other traditions: Steven Alspach and Daniel Alspach, “A First Century Liturgy,” posted 1 Feb 2021, by The Catholic Brothers, YouTube, 27:39, https://youtu.be/hect5BG02gU; Gavin Ortlund, “What Church Was Like in 150 AD,” posted 30 Mar 2026, by Truth Unites, YouTube, 38:01, https://youtu.be/6h9mkybHep0.

[2] Smith, From Symposium to Eucharist, 1-46; Dennis E. Smith, “The Greco-Roman Banquet as Social Institution,” in Meals in the Early Christian World (Palgrave MacMillan, 2012), 23-33.

[3] Although this exact structure was not always, or even typically, followed: Charles H. Cosgrove, “Banquet Ceremonies Involving Wine in the Greco-Roman World and Early Christianity,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 79, no. 2 (2017): 299-316.

[4] Smith, “The Greco-Roman Banquet as Social Institution,” 31-32.

[5] Smith, From Symposium to Eucharist, 134-144.

[6] Smith, From Symposium to Eucharist, 144-147, citing t. Ber. 4, 8, 98.

[7] Siegfried Stein, “The Influence of Symposia Literature on the Literary Form of the Pesaḥ Haggadah,” Journal of Jewish Studies 8, no. 1-2 (1957): 13-44; Smith, From Symposium to Eucharist, 147-150.

[8] Philo died in ca. AD 50 or earlier, while the traditional date for the arrival of Christianity in Alexandria is in the early 40s or later. Even if we allow the maximum range, there would only have been a few years for the Christian community to become established and for Philo to take notice and write about them. This seems rather unlikely to me.

What "church" looked like in the early Church: First century

    In the last post, we started to examine what church gatherings looked like in the early Church by studying the Lord’s supper and ritual ...